To be fair, nowhere does Pioneer Carry claim the Division or the 10x material is thin, slim or supple. That's good, because it definately is not. It looks and feels remarkably well-made, and extremely durable. The card slots are easy to use (you dont have to fight to get cards in or out). The fabric has a nice, subtle pattern to it. ...But the wallet is definately not slim. Its fat before you even put a card or bill in it...
And its stiff. It looks and feels slightly "plastic." I know it's supposed to break in... but I've been sitting on it and pulling out cards and bills for many weeks and it's still not exactly "soft."
I made the mistaken assumption that any hi-tech material would be slimmer and more flexible than you'd find, say, in my dad's old school leather wallet. Isn't that kind of the point? (Any material would be more durable if you just made it thicker and less flexible.) Well thats not the case with the Division in 10x. It's cutting edge material, but 1970's fat!
I went with the 10x material, since it was the "latest and greatest" and i liked the colors--its possible that the other materials would be a better choice.
BUT... I'm not sure that alone would be enough to make it work for me. It's not material alone the makes the wallet so fat... the design is a big factor. The spacing and design of the card slots, the way the material is layered, wrapped and/or stitched, particularly where the wallet folds. My previous wallet (leather) was the almost the same layout, but filled with exact same cards and number of bills, it is slimmer by a significant margin. It's the design, more than the fabric/material. They designed the wallet with fewer overlapping layers
I like Pioneer Carry, and what they are doing. (And they happen to be a local company--for me--which is nice.) If durability is your top priority, the Division 10x may be for you. I may try another PC wallet someday, but the Division wasn't right for me... its been relegated to a drawer, and I'm back to
my old (thin) wallet!